Sublime directory Surf the web anonymous Pagerank Monitor


Adobe Illustrator or Corel?

Valkyrie
Sat 8 April 2006, 07:11 pm GMT +0200
What do you use? I find corel so comfusing! On the other hand i find illustrator great and fully co-operative with photoshop. For example you copy from illustratot to photoshop and vice versa but in corel you have to export, save the file as eps and then open with photoshop...Tell me your oppinion, i d like to learn what the rest of the world feels :).

olaf
Sat 8 April 2006, 08:17 pm GMT +0200
Illustrator is the industry standard, if you're busy in the graphical world you must have it.

Corel is nice and not so expensive, a good solution for companies which don't need to share files

Nikolas
Sat 8 April 2006, 08:22 pm GMT +0200
I vote for Photoshop. (should we make this topic a poll?)

It has more many feautures.

About the price, my opinion is that in this case you get what you pay :)

olaf
Sat 8 April 2006, 08:27 pm GMT +0200
I vote for Photoshop. (should we make this topic a poll?)

It has more many feautures.

About the price, my opinion is that in this case you get what you pay :)
I do not agree Nikolas, photoshop is great for photo's, filters and CMYK. Illustrator is great for illustrations and vector graphics.

Nikolas
Sat 8 April 2006, 08:34 pm GMT +0200
Yeah you are right (I don't agree with my self? :) )

Photoshop is for raster only. Illustrator is propably the best for vector, but I use Flash for vector graphics, as I am too lazy, and I don't really need vector graphics editing for serious stuff :)

olaf
Sat 8 April 2006, 08:37 pm GMT +0200
I use for the web only macromedia fireworks, it's a mix from raster and vector GREAT
a good thing is that you can copy paste fireworks to flash.

Valkyrie
Sun 9 April 2006, 12:50 am GMT +0200
Go ahead and make a poll about illustrator and corel and see who wins!

Nikolas
Sun 9 April 2006, 06:38 pm GMT +0200
Cool. I've added my vote :)

Valkyrie
Sun 9 April 2006, 07:08 pm GMT +0200
Me too :)

olaf
Sun 9 April 2006, 07:58 pm GMT +0200
I think there is a leading tool... ;D

Nikolas
Sun 9 April 2006, 10:34 pm GMT +0200
I think there is a leading tool... ;D

Yeah it seems so, but we should wait the others to vote too :)

artcoder
Tue 11 April 2006, 06:08 am GMT +0200
Adobe Illustrator all the way.  I think it is the industry standard for magazine layouts and print media.  Photoshop is the other industry standard for graphics work that I know a lot of companies uses.  Although for quick web graphic, I like Macromedia (oops, now Adobe) Fireworks because it is so easy and intuitive.

vbignacio
Mon 24 April 2006, 01:58 am GMT +0200
corel for me. been using it since version 5. what i like is it is bundled with other applications like photo editing, animation, etc.

htmlmaster
Tue 25 April 2006, 01:11 am GMT +0200
Well, I have used either, but I've heard great things about Corel and I haven't heard much about Adobe Illustrator.

wineo
Tue 25 April 2006, 05:21 am GMT +0200
I find Illustrator to be the one for me! I also find that a lot of signage printers use Corel; not sure why but I think it is because it has a larger work area.

olaf
Tue 25 April 2006, 07:10 am GMT +0200
I find Illustrator to be the one for me! I also find that a lot of signage printers use Corel; not sure why but I think it is because it has a larger work area.
corel is much cheaper than illustrator...

vbignacio
Tue 25 April 2006, 12:58 pm GMT +0200
"...a lot of signage printers use Corel..."

yes they do. i had a tarpaulin banner made with a large format printer here and they require me to give my design either in corel or jpeg file. maybe that is what their machine is compatible. whereas an image-setter, used in making negative or positive film for offset or gravure printing require an illustrator file.

Nikolas
Tue 25 April 2006, 01:07 pm GMT +0200
Quote
"...a lot of signage printers use Corel..."

yes they do. i had a tarpaulin banner made with a large format printer here and they require me to give my design either in corel or jpeg file. maybe that is what their machine is compatible. whereas an image-setter, used in making negative or positive film for offset or gravure printing require an illustrator file.

As you say, that depends on the program that the printing company has, but proffessional companies just want a vector format (corel, illustrator or anything else)

This of course has to do only with offset printing.

rcep
Fri 9 June 2006, 04:48 pm GMT +0200
i guess illustrater is better
But i use corel am used to it
its cool

Archive for SMF v1.00 by N.P. Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional