CoolDude55
Tue 10 February 2009, 03:38 am GMT +0100
imagine this world of internet without spammers?
how do you find it?
rosemarschall09
Tue 10 February 2009, 09:01 am GMT +0100
Boring....:lol:
YMC
Tue 10 February 2009, 04:55 pm GMT +0100
You two have managed to reach an all new low, two forum spammers talking to each other about keeping spam on the Internet.
lizkurt
Wed 11 February 2009, 09:34 am GMT +0100
hahaha that's funny but so true YMC
dbugz
Wed 26 August 2009, 09:38 pm GMT +0200
You will not be able to kick out spammers in the internet. It's like a cycle. No Spammers = No Internet Business like this website.
Natcoweb.com
Tue 15 September 2009, 09:24 am GMT +0200
If there are no spammers, there will be anothor group of people to fight with, I'm afraid that's inevitable.
barry100
Sun 20 September 2009, 04:36 pm GMT +0200
the worst kind of spammer is the obvious spammer. Only there to anoy and disrupt... DAMN YOU!
ericcartman
Sat 10 October 2009, 10:34 am GMT +0200
Boring....:lol:
LOL, agree!
MarcusAurelius
Tue 13 October 2009, 10:42 am GMT +0200
Ohhh It's really annoyin when you go to a forum and the last 20 posts were posted by the same guy withing 4 minutes and it's all arabic
AmbrellCooder
Tue 9 March 2010, 12:16 pm GMT +0100
Imagine a glass without water.
sunnyleon
Wed 10 March 2010, 06:40 am GMT +0100
I don;t think so that an internet world without spammers.
C0ldf1re
Sun 28 March 2010, 03:48 pm GMT +0200
Seriously (is one allowed to be serious on this thread?) how do you spot a spammer?
I don't mean the obvious ones, but the sneaky ones. Like I saw a post which was along the lines, "I've seen this offer etc etc on www,sitename,com. It looks great, but has anyone else tried it?" It looked like a genuine post to me, but then a more experienced netizen pointed out that the poster "asking for advice" was actually a spammer promoting the site.
The reason for asking is that I am planning a forum, and I obviously need tips on how spammers work and how to defeat the varmints.
Nikolas
Mon 29 March 2010, 04:03 pm GMT +0200
When someone has 3 posts, one of them is their member introduction and the other two are of this type ("has anyone else tried it....") then it is probably a spammer :)
jank858
Fri 16 April 2010, 10:39 pm GMT +0200
Some spammers are really sneaky which makes it very funny at times and annoying too.
sharmani
Sat 17 April 2010, 09:39 am GMT +0200
Boring...without spamm
C0ldf1re
Sun 25 April 2010, 11:41 pm GMT +0200
Boring...without spamm
Some people manage to make excellent & helpful posts without trying to sell anything.
designer
Mon 26 April 2010, 05:00 am GMT +0200
There are human spammers, auto spammers are easier to spot, human spammers are harder to track down...
C0ldf1re
Mon 26 April 2010, 10:59 am GMT +0200
... auto spammers are easier to spot...
What is an auto-spammer? How do you spot them?
cara.micheal
Wed 28 April 2010, 09:55 am GMT +0200
We have no idea to get rid of spammers
C0ldf1re
Wed 28 April 2010, 03:54 pm GMT +0200
Does anyone know the answer to this? I saw some spam on a blog a while back, and it caught my eye because the keyword tag on the spam URL mentioned my town. I couldn't resist following the URL, and the spammer turned out to be someone I knew from school. Being naturally curious, I asked Google about "link:HisSpamUrl", to see if he was building up the massive backlinks he seemed to be looking for. There were no backlinks at all from the blog in question. I went back to look at a pageview of the blog pages, and there was his backlink embedded without any no-follow tag. I couldn't resist emailing him to say that his spamming was all in vain. He replied that Google was indeed indexing his backlinks and contributing to his site's pagerank, but that Google was "picky" about the links it revealed on a backlink search. He said that there were other secret ways to see the real backlinks, which he couldn't reveal. I am consumed with curiousity to know whether he was telling the truth, or whether he was bluffing. Can you help? Please!
designer
Thu 29 April 2010, 05:18 am GMT +0200
Does anyone know the answer to this? I saw some spam on a blog a while back, and it caught my eye because the keyword tag on the spam URL mentioned my town. I couldn't resist following the URL, and the spammer turned out to be someone I knew from school. Being naturally curious, I asked Google about "link:HisSpamUrl", to see if he was building up the massive backlinks he seemed to be looking for. There were no backlinks at all from the blog in question. I went back to look at a pageview of the blog pages, and there was his backlink embedded without any no-follow tag. I couldn't resist emailing him to say that his spamming was all in vain. He replied that Google was indeed indexing his backlinks and contributing to his site's pagerank, but that Google was "picky" about the links it revealed on a backlink search. He said that there were other secret ways to see the real backlinks, which he couldn't reveal. I am consumed with curiousity to know whether he was telling the truth, or whether he was bluffing. Can you help? Please!
Yes there are other ways to do that, from an SEO standpoint, its kind of a trade secret. Although he used a method of direct spamming, which is actually just a way to point to your site by e-mailing all contact in the contact list or those with a keyword which in this case is your town...
... auto spammers are easier to spot...
What is an auto-spammer? How do you spot them?
These are bots, and some are macros running automatically on a spammers server, they usually use the same method and links to run. It is setup by a human though. CAPTCHAs are good way to stop auto spammers, but CAPTCHAS fail on human spammers and sometimes auto scrapers can bypass a captcha. So it will have about 80% effectiveness. On the other hand the one used by other sites is called Akismet, this has about 90% effectiveness. I also used a method I shared here in webdigity before that is easy to implement and is about 85% effective...
C0ldf1re
Thu 29 April 2010, 09:49 am GMT +0200
... He said that there were other secret ways to see the real backlinks, which he couldn't reveal. I am consumed with curiousity to know whether he was telling the truth, or whether he was bluffing. Can you help? Please!
Yes there are other ways to do that, from an SEO standpoint, its kind of a trade secret...
IMHO people who say, "I know the answer to your question, but I'm not telling because it's a secret", should be boiled alive.
designer
Fri 30 April 2010, 03:15 am GMT +0200
Well Yeah, I should burn then... lol! Anyway you can learn about it if you spend some time searching about it. A little tip, there are other search engines and site analytics that can trace this hidden backlinks...
C0ldf1re
Fri 30 April 2010, 03:49 am GMT +0200
... there are other search engines and site analytics that can trace this hidden backlinks...
Ahaa! Like as in Yahoo tells you about more backlinks than Google does, but they will be the same links?
Thanks. To show my gratitude, I'll let you off the boiling oil!
designer
Sun 2 May 2010, 07:29 am GMT +0200
yes, something like that... Try Bing if you really want to dig deep... lol!
negreanu
Tue 23 November 2010, 07:14 pm GMT +0100
imagine this world of internet without spammers?
how do you find it?
There will never be such a thing. You must understand how "the way of the spammer" works :))
vincentjo
Thu 20 January 2011, 08:26 am GMT +0100
spamming sucks!
shawnchin
Sat 22 January 2011, 01:24 am GMT +0100
Without Spammers No Competition No Achievement
vtpp
Sun 23 January 2011, 05:26 pm GMT +0100
Without Spammers No Competition No Achievement
Lol, you think? How about honest competitions?
Robert Weston
Tue 1 February 2011, 06:55 am GMT +0100
Jammers.
Robert Weston
Tue 1 February 2011, 06:59 am GMT +0100
Just try and win the game.
angie828
Sun 29 May 2011, 11:57 pm GMT +0200
Spammers will be around forever. It does not matter what you do. They will find a way to post no matter what it takes.
C0ldf1re
Mon 30 May 2011, 05:01 am GMT +0200
You can't appeal to a spammer's conscience. They never read what is on the forum.
pesvesel
Wed 1 June 2011, 08:21 pm GMT +0200
no spam= no fun
spam = fun
but in the topics destinated to spam.
crystal.barba123
Thu 2 June 2011, 01:33 pm GMT +0200
lolzzz... imagine world without diseases..
Doctors will suffer,,,
Similarly, those who are cyber heroes.. will have no values!!
They will be treated like normal computer operators!! :)
summerwilkins
Thu 16 June 2011, 09:23 pm GMT +0200
Spammers? They are at times helpful too. But they do put spice in the life of a forum.
kiddoman
Fri 17 June 2011, 02:58 am GMT +0200
No spammer? Come on, that is too boring!