Topic: Adsense disallows images next to ads (Read 2689 times)
I am a metal monkey!
Administrator Community Supporter?
Jedai Sword Master
Gender:
Posts: 7974
40801 credits Members referred : 3
« on: Dec 25, 2006, 01:38:19 PM »
Looks like adsense has changed their TOS, in a way that will cause problems and lower CTRs to many webmasters.
As they say :
Quote
We ask that publishers not line up images and ads in a way that suggests a relationship between the images and the ads. If your visitors believe that the images and the ads are directly associated, or that the advertiser is offering the exact item found in the neighboring image, they may click the ad expecting to find something that isn't actually being offered. That's not a good experience for users or advertisers.
I am a fanatic. So?
Gender:
Posts: 599
3727 credits Members referred : 2
« Reply #2 on: Dec 26, 2006, 07:26:36 AM »
Hmm, looks like I have a bit of work to do tomorrow/today.
I do see the point, but they sure took long enough to decide this. There's going to be a lot of unhappy folks if they start penalizing/dropping sites that do this.
Article promotion master Community Supporter?
World Wide Whale
Posts: 154
801 credits Members referred : 0
« Reply #8 on: Jan 10, 2007, 03:31:05 AM »
As long as Google gives time to the webmasters to change the ad placement, I think things will be ok. When sites starts to get banned abruptly, I gues there will be a lot more threads on how Google is unfair.
If not images, webmasters will find some other way to increase CTR.
Global Moderator Community Supporter?
Jedai Sword Master
Gender:
Posts: 6280
38506 credits Members referred : 374
As long as Google gives time to the webmasters to change the ad placement, I think things will be ok. When sites starts to get banned abruptly, I gues there will be a lot more threads on how Google is unfair.
If not images, webmasters will find some other way to increase CTR.
yes right Google need to give some time to webmasters but how much? this is already old news... I think people trying to cheat need to try adwords first (a click for hosting ads is arround a 1 $)
I am a fanatic. So?
Gender:
Posts: 599
3727 credits Members referred : 2
« Reply #10 on: Jan 12, 2007, 12:26:47 AM »
I think that this is a big enough issue that G should email all publishers with this information. To me it's not realistic to hope that a blog post and the viral-type conversations it spawed will ensure everyone knows and understands this policy.
Quite a few still don't understand the concept of no picture as it was not as clear as it could have been in the blog post.
I think that this is a big enough issue that G should email all publishers with this information. To me it's not realistic to hope that a blog post and the viral-type conversations it spawed will ensure everyone knows and understands this policy.
Quite a few still don't understand the concept of no picture as it was not as clear as it could have been in the blog post.
Normally you're right, but just in case your are Google (that would be nice ), do you like to send an email to all the people which are misleading your advertisers?
I am a fanatic. So?
Gender:
Posts: 599
3727 credits Members referred : 2
« Reply #17 on: Jan 12, 2007, 10:40:28 PM »
I didn't mean it should be sent to only the offenders. G does send mass emails to all publishers on occasion. I just think whenever there is a major policy change they should 'officially' notify everyone so there's no excuses and/or misunderstandings.
I didn't mean it should be sent to only the offenders. G does send mass emails to all publishers on occasion. I just think whenever there is a major policy change they should 'officially' notify everyone so there's no excuses and/or misunderstandings.
you're right they not very good in announcements, today I read in their blog that they change something with the google packs (referals)
You do feel quite strongly about these MFA sites!!!
maybe this is wrong, but don't you think that less websites on the internet are better for us as "real" webmasters (and all internet users)
and as advertiser, I hate them of course...
I agree completely. Not only because these are the equivalent of site spams but also because they more often than not provide information which may be incorrect. In the sense that if i run a health site what value add can I do to ensure that the information is valid (as i am not from that field). Imagine the consequence of someone following advice from such sites.
In fact this is probably the major issue with the internet today. Anyone can put any information they want on a site and the average browser does not know if it is authentic.
Site ratings probably are the way out but so far not much success.. Google PR could have been useful but ... we all know the story
Trackback URI for this entry : http://www.webdigity.com/trackback.php?topic=5373