Global Moderator Community Supporter?
Jedai Sword Master
Gender:
Posts: 6309
38674 credits Members referred : 374
It's time to use PHP5!
« Reply #1 on: Apr 12, 2008, 08:31:37 AM »
wordpress, sure it's a weblog but you can use it for some websites too never used a regular CMS, I know some guy is using Joomla as backend while all the pages are created by himself
I am a metal monkey!
Administrator Community Supporter?
Jedai Sword Master
Gender:
Posts: 8037
41179 credits Members referred : 3
« Reply #4 on: Apr 12, 2008, 12:33:55 PM »
If you are going to use Joomla, I think that Drupal is a better solution. On the other hand if you need something easy and quick, wordpress is always a great choice
Tim Nash
Global Moderator Community Supporter?
Internet Junkie
Posts: 2173
5036 credits Members referred : 2
Venture Skills - New Media & IT group
« Reply #5 on: Apr 12, 2008, 05:08:08 PM »
Drupal if you really want a CMS its permission and node system makes it flexible and it has a really good API system meaning the number of modules (plugins) make even wordpress plugin db look small.
With a little learning anyone can create half decent and complex sites without any php coding, just through the CCK/Views/Actions modules.
However if you only want to publish a group of articles then Wordpress, if you want to be bogged down in appalling code, bad documentation and a bunch of support forums telling you they don't know either then by all means Joomla but its your own sanity your throwing away.
just wondering thou why Joomla won last years award for the best cms?
I think the awards are given by people didn't know about web development
Joomla is OK for people didn't know better, I guess the price is always because it's very easy to use.
It it has managed to gather a lot of great designers around it and there are some stunning (paid) templates for it. Drupal is just starting to attract web designers lately.
Also I think Joomla was forked 2-3 years ago from Mambo which was an open source CMS that was backed up by full time employees of Miro and started in 2000 and by the time that Drupal came out (open source community backed) Mambo had already a lot of followers.
When joomla came out - from the developers of Mambo that did not like the practices of Miro - lots of the users jump immediately from Mambo to joomla.
Tim Nash
Global Moderator Community Supporter?
Internet Junkie
Posts: 2173
5036 credits Members referred : 2
Venture Skills - New Media & IT group
« Reply #10 on: Apr 13, 2008, 02:35:12 PM »
without descending the thread into politics just look at the president of US
the best don't always win, Drupal has never been a fav with web designers it has a steep learning curve that photoshop fan boys don't like though it has been around for many years well before both Joomla and Mambo and has been powering sites like the onion for a fair few years.
drupal 5 and 6 have changed templating to make it more designer friendly and have added some much needed documentation to its templating system.
Pinoy Webmaster
.com pimp
Gender:
Posts: 1126
6048 credits Members referred : 0
Philippine Beaches
« Reply #11 on: Apr 13, 2008, 03:42:04 PM »
the reason i asked is i have to make a site for someone who doesnt really like to fuzz around with coding. so i installed wordpress for her and i think its pretty easy to learn to use and get the hang of.
but i think drupal is what i will be using for my next site. thanks again for the info.
Tim Nash
Global Moderator Community Supporter?
Internet Junkie
Posts: 2173
5036 credits Members referred : 2
Venture Skills - New Media & IT group
« Reply #13 on: Apr 13, 2008, 06:23:00 PM »
Drop drupal first incarnation was 2000 though the source code itself wasn't made public Jan 2001, Mambo source code was released in April 2001 prio to that like Drupal it had been floating but its first formal release and that of the source code on sourceforge was 4 months later then Drupal.
So your right years was inappropriate it seemed like it but I was only dimly aware of mambo still Drupal released it source code and was a open source project pre Mambo and out of the two it was Drupal that was leading at least in terms of major sites running it, but web developers failed to take to it.
Joomla has never left the realm of being an amateur web designer toy running sites that had previously used a nuke clone. Drupal on the other hand never really managed to get into that market at all wordpress sits neatly between the two and with blogging rising became quickly the more popular of the three.
Bill Gates is my home boy
Gender:
Posts: 605
3767 credits Members referred : 2
« Reply #14 on: Apr 13, 2008, 06:36:16 PM »
I'm using CMS Made Simple on one of my sites. Was fairly easy to set up and there are a nice variety of free templates available. They aren't too bad to get validated. (I don't think I've seen a CMS or directory script that actually has fully validated templates.)
The main drawbacks that I have found is the script creator seems to be relying on the goodwill of others to support his product and that it seems to be a little bandwidth heavy. He does however put out patches and upgrades as needed. Otherwise, I like it and it provides what I need.
Radical Sales Monster
Spy Agent
Posts: 113
334 credits Members referred : 0
« Reply #15 on: Jul 28, 2008, 07:03:39 AM »
So, we are about to design a community, and while I will not be in charge of install, set up, design, or add ons, I will have to maintain pages, communities, commenting....yada yada yada.
I have used Joomla and it is pretty riigid in my opinion. There are tools but they give you little flexibility, especially if you know a bit of code.
Is Drupal easier to administer?
Nikolas' Servant's Servant
Posts: 29
178 credits Members referred : 0
« Reply #16 on: Jul 29, 2008, 11:04:52 AM »
Considering the open-source CMS.I choose wordpress for my own site .
Radical Sales Monster
Spy Agent
Posts: 113
334 credits Members referred : 0
« Reply #17 on: Jul 30, 2008, 06:39:55 AM »
Wordpress for an online community?
Global Moderator Community Supporter?
Jedai Sword Master
Gender:
Posts: 6309
38674 credits Members referred : 374