SEO or PPC

I wouldn't reccomend PPC unless you are really good and have enough knowledge about it.Evene though PPC is more of immediate cash, not everyone can succeed with it

PPC is good if you are marketing any product.

We voted for SEO! PPC is fine for short-term online advertising, but for long-term, on-going marketing, you'll want to utilize SEO--either on your own or outsource it.

Well, SEO is no doubt the better option but If someone has enough money then he must also try PPC as well as it can give results quick but there is also risk of losing money. So why take the risk, better go with SEO

My vote go for SEO. Organic traffic is always better than paid traffic.

SEO, of course! It is budgeted, long-term and continuous. PPC is more for a short-term promotion, since it can be costly.

Well, SEO of course is the better choice. Although its does take time to produce results but its more of a secure way. PPC can sometimes work well while sometimes it can fail also and all the money spent is lost. Therefore, I recommend SEO over PPC....

PPC is like renting a house.. You have to pay when you stay there.. Once you stop, you have to leave...

SEO is organic and I prefer that... Very sensible, isn't it ? ? ?

i would go with SEO..because when you use PPC the day you stop paying the ads will not be displayed and your traffic will come to halt but in SEO your posts will always be visible..

If you need long time benefit then SEO is only one best option, need not to pay more. If you need instant traffic then you can go for PPC.

Both are good enough and give same results. SEO is a free process and PPC is paid. Just the difference is that PPC give immediate results. Well both activities promote website and increase sales.

SEO, of course. This is a budgeted form of promotion to your sites and is long-term. PPC is a shorter-term method of promotion.

SEO - Its free, its for long term (as your efforts are capitalized) and it brings relevant visitors on your website.

Depends on your motives. A mix of both may be best.

It is always good to rank highly in the organic search results, but sometimes you don't have the time or desire to do SEO full-time.

I worked for a small company some years ago and they wanted to sell their products but they didn't want to wait two or more years for the results of an SEO campaign to get their site onto the first page of the search results listing. So they paid for an AdWords campaign. It was very effective, like having a full-time employee working in the office marketing their product but at a fraction of the cost. That way, people did not have to filter through pages and pages of search results that may have been research papers, hobbyist sites, etc. that were totally irrelevant to the market my company was after. They were a brick-and-mortar store, they wanted to advertise their product, didn't mind paying for ads, didn't mind if people knew they were advertising their product, etc. PPC is a VERY effective way to market a product or site.

Surely SEO since it offers long term effects.

i agree too

I prefer SEO than PPC as SEO is for a long term and can give you a greater result in no time.

Why would you pay for something you can get for free? I use seo only and i would recomend you to do the same ynless you got some extra money and you dont really know what to do with it lol. If u really need to spend some money give it to me and ill do seo for  u:P

Both are fine, but ppc is bit expensive then seo. But ppc also having instant result where as seo getting slow result, yes still  long time also.

I use all SEO strategies to promote my website on different search engines.

[Guest]

[62.886]

Googlebot